I’ll begin with why you should not vote for her. What exactly is Kamala Harris going to do as President? The truth is, we don’t know—because she hasn't really told us. She’s often used empty rhetoric to mask her true nature, which is aligned with some of the most radical, leftist positions seen in the U.S. Senate prior to her rise to the Vice Presidency. She hasn’t disavowed many of her nearly Marxist positions. For instance, in 2019, while campaigning for president, she advocated for banning fracking. Today, she claims otherwise. Similarly, she once supported the idea of replacing private health insurance with government-provided healthcare but has since retracted. At one time, she wanted to ban gas-powered cars, a move she now denies, though similar measures are already planned for the mid-2030s.
Some positions she holds today remain controversial. For instance, she supports taxpayer-funded sex change operations for illegal immigrants and prisoners, advocates for limits on red meat consumption, and has pushed for a ban on offshore drilling—though she later attempted to walk back that stance. She aims to phase out the fossil fuel industry and eliminate the Senate filibuster to pass measures like the Green New Deal and an abortion rights bill. Eliminating the filibuster would alter the Senate’s function permanently, allowing legislation to pass with a simple majority of 51 votes rather than the 60 required currently, which protects minority representation. This change might seem appealing when in the majority, but it could backfire when in the minority.
Let’s consider the implications of abolishing the filibuster for a national abortion rights law. Despite Harris’s pro-choice stance, such a bill wouldn’t pass easily; the Democrats are likely to lose Senate control, and even if they held a slim majority, changing the filibuster would mean any party with 51 votes could alter critical policies. A federal abortion mandate, if passed, would likely face legal challenges and could be overturned by the Supreme Court as it encroaches on states’ rights. If this power were federalised, it could lead to a scenario where a future pro-life majority could enforce a national abortion ban—eliminating the very protections pro-choice advocates seek. Abortion is, constitutionally, a state issue. Anyone concerned about abortion should focus on electing pro-choice governors and legislators rather than relying on federal action, as the risk of backlash is real and likely.
Beyond abortion, her stance on immigration and law enforcement is equally vague and shifting. She no longer speaks about decriminalising illegal border crossings but also doesn’t clarify her stance on deportations, only mentioning pathways to citizenship for the millions who crossed the border during her tenure. She once supported defunding the police and has backed a mandatory gun buyback program, an approach that raises constitutional concerns about retroactively criminalising lawful firearm ownership. Although she’s tried to soften her stance, she still favours an assault weapons ban that could restrict semi-automatic handguns, which are widely owned in the United States.
Harris also advocates for public healthcare funding for undocumented immigrants—a costly policy that many Americans may find unpalatable. She promises to expand social benefits to undocumented residents, providing healthcare, housing, and food assistance. For many Americans, affording healthcare for themselves is a struggle, let alone footing the bill for individuals residing illegally in the country. Moreover, her cultural stance is controversial; she promotes a "woke" ideology, which she describes as essential, even encouraging others to stay "woke." Her inclusivity extends to hosting unconventional figures at the White House, which some find inappropriate and out of place.
Harris’s belief in equity—ensuring everyone ends up in the same place, regardless of merit or hard work—underpins her political philosophy. Unlike equality, which aims for equal opportunities, equity demands equal outcomes, even if it means disregarding individual merit. Her own rise in politics reflects this mindset. Harris didn’t advance purely on merit: from her entry into Howard University to her law career, reports suggest her career has benefited from diversity policies and political relationships more than professional achievements. Her connection to powerful figures in California politics, particularly through personal relationships, helped catapult her into influential roles.
As Vice President, Harris has had a notably high staff turnover rate, with reports describing her as a challenging boss. Allegations of verbal abuse and a toxic work environment have surrounded her office, which saw over 92% of her staff leave within her first year. This reputation preceded her presidential campaign, where staff and insiders reportedly voiced concerns over her readiness and temperament, recognising her radical views as polarising even within her party.
In conclusion, Kamala Harris’s policies, personality, and leadership record raise many questions. Her stance on key issues like immigration, policing, gun control, and healthcare, combined with her radical equity-driven philosophy, leave much uncertainty about her capability to lead. These characteristics, along with her reputed management style, form the basis for strong reservations regarding her leadership potential.
+++++
Boy, 210am EST, DJT Finishes his Final rally speech! What a Man, What an Energy! Now it is up to Americans with common sense!
++++
Lalitha asked me now over Lunch what Trump would do, if he wins!! I listed!!! (Lucky 13!).
- Drill Baby Drill-Oil will flow like water, so the back bone of economy will revamp with direct imapct on price.
- Tax cuts for every one. No tax on Tips, Overtime.
- Cut Iran to Size, Wont hesitate to hit Iran Nuclear facilities, (Israel will be empowered).
- Work on means for Price reduction of essential items.
- Appoint RFK Jr to coordinate Make America Health again- War on Processed Foods/ Pharma Industry Lobby.
- F1 visa can lead to Automatic Green card in 4-5 years for legal migrants coming to USA.
- Remove Transgender participating in Girls Sports. Remove Sex change operation satute for children below 18 without parent consent. (State would stay away!).
- Remove as many Illegals as possible. (Difficult of all tasks-!! Wont be easy).
- Decisive Decision on Ukraine war. (How it would be done is mystery, but knowing DJT unpredictability- dont bet against it!).
- Release JFK assassination and other sensitive files for truth to come out.
- Appoint ELON MUSK to oversee, government footprint reduction.
- If he gets Senate Majority too, Ask the 3 old SCOTUS Judges to retire and put 3 in their 50s for atleast 30 year 6-3 conservative Majority. (Roberts, Thomas, Alito!).
- Jokes of Inititatives like DEI, WOKE, ESG will go to Dustbin.
No comments:
Post a Comment