100 Orders in 10 Days: Why Trump’s Return Is a Political Earthquake.

 #610

Personal Update: Back from a week of Business Travel; my first in 5 months. Boy one hell of a time. The body is not making it, tough road ahead for sure... I am not giving up!! 

Donald J. Trump is back in the White House, and he isn’t wasting a single second. It’s been less than ten full working days, and yet the sheer volume of executive actions, policy reversals, and direct engagements has left both allies and opponents scrambling. With close to 100 executive orders already signed, his return to power feels more like a political earthquake than a transition.

A Relentless Pace Unlike Any Other

Trump has done more in his first 10 days than Biden and Harris managed in four sluggish years. The contrast is staggering. While Sleepy Joe and Witch Kamala stayed hidden behind teleprompters and controlled media appearances, Trump has:

• Traveled coast to coast, personally assessing disaster zones from hurricanes to wildfires.
• Signed executive orders in rapid succession, obliterating Biden-era mandates on DEI, climate hysteria, ESG, and woke policies.
• Held impromptu press conferences while signing orders, directly engaging with the media instead of hiding behind scripted narratives.
• Demanded legislative action, calling for a single, comprehensive bill to drive economic reform—aimed at tax cuts, slashing prices, and restoring business confidence.

The media, global elites, and the D.C. establishment are struggling to keep up. They underestimated his preparation. He used his four years out of office to plan meticulously—ensuring that once back in power, his presidency would operate like a well-oiled machine.

Saboteurs Within the GOP?

While the Democrats and the deep state are expected to oppose Trump at every turn, what’s more concerning is the sabotage within the Republican Party itself. Trump’s cabinet is taking shape, but the usual GOP establishment figures are trying to derail his nominees. The likes of Mitch McConnell and his ilk may pretend to support conservative governance, but history suggests otherwise. Will they bow to Trump’s America First agenda, or will they try to slow-walk and obstruct his policies?

His demand for bold action from Congress is a test—not just for the GOP but for the entire Washington system. Will they deliver the tax cuts, energy independence, and border security America needs? Or will they cower to the same forces that held back his first term?

America First: The Emerging Theme

With Trump back at the helm, the era of appeasement, diversity mandates, and woke economic controls is over. The message is clear:

• Meritocracy, not identity politics – No more DEI-driven hiring quotas, woke military leadership, or social justice distractions.
• Energy independence restored – Climate change hysteria is sidelined, while policies shift towards an oil, gas, and coal-driven energy dominance.
• Trade policies that benefit Americans first – No more handouts to China, no more propping up globalist institutions that weaken U.S. industries.
• Law and order, without excuses – No tolerance for crime spikes caused by leftist policies. Expect a full-throttle push to restore policing strength.

The theme of his return is clear: "American Way or No Way." The globalist shackles are coming off, and he’s setting the stage for a true America First revolution.

What Comes Next?

• More executive orders? Absolutely. If 100 orders can be signed in 10 days, what will the first 100 days look like?
• Border crisis reversal – Expect aggressive action against illegal immigration, with mass deportations and strong deterrence policies.
• Big Tech crackdown – Will Trump use executive authority to finally hold Big Tech accountable for censorship and election interference?
• Foreign policy reset – NATO allies, China, and Iran will soon realise that the Trump Doctrine is back: strength, not submission.

Trump is not just undoing Biden’s mess—he’s making sure it never happens again. The coming weeks will define his legacy even before the next election cycle begins.

Conclusion: The Swamp vs. the Tsunami

The swamp isn’t going to sit back and watch. Bureaucrats, career politicians, globalists, and left-wing activists are gearing up to resist every move he makes. But Trump is off to a historic, blistering start, and America First is back with a vengeance.

As the political landscape shifts at breakneck speed, one thing is certain: Washington is no longer the same. And the world better brace for what’s next.

Karthik

29th Jan 2025

12 Noon. 

Stop Complaining: Why the 90-Hour Work Week Is an Opportunity, Not Exploitation....

 #609

The recent uproar over L&T Chairman Subramanhyan’s comments about working 90-hour weeks has been nothing short of perplexing. Add to that Narayana Murthy’s earlier remarks advocating a 70-hour work week, and you’ve got a chorus of complaints about “exploitation” and “unrealistic expectations.” But is it really such a big deal? From my experience, these kinds of work schedules are not new, nor are they unreasonable under certain circumstances. Let’s not miss the forest for the trees.

I never comment on anything Indian—it is not worth the bother. Beyond my Indian wife’s words, anything about India feels irrelevant, irrational, immaterial, idiotic, or insane to waste time on. However, this topic struck a personal chord, so here I go. For context, my India begins and ends with Malleswaram (West!).

Between 1988 and 1990, I worked 90-hour weeks effortlessly, month after month for good 6-7 months and few short bursts thereafter. This was not some mundane 9-to-9 drudgery. It was high-stakes, high-impact work involving troubleshooting in the manufacturing of life-saving drugs. My shift ran from 7 p.m. to 9 a.m., seven days a week. The issues were complex and required immediate solutions to ensure operations didn’t grind to a halt. The work demanded focus, resilience, and a willingness to go above and beyond.

Yes, the rewards were modest by today’s standards—free meals at the best restaurant near the site and extra hours credited for my vacations to Karaikudi (a 1,900-km journey, mind you). But the satisfaction of solving critical problems and seeing the results delivered was immeasurable. As Ronaldo Sr. once said, it was “better than sex.”

To those who argue that such work schedules are unsustainable, I say this: Nobody is suggesting you do it forever. Even Subramanian’s comments, if taken in context, were likely aimed at specific phases of high-intensity work that arise occasionally. These periods can be vital learning curves, exposing you to challenges that build resilience, skill, and a deeper understanding of your field. Working these intense hours once every few years is not exploitation; it’s an investment in your own growth.

The Bigger Picture

The outrage surrounding these statements seems to stem from a broader cultural shift. Many from the current generation view long hours as a form of exploitation rather than an opportunity. The focus has shifted from quality and excellence to superficial metrics like work-life balance, often at the cost of career growth.

Here’s the truth: If you’re unwilling to bend your back and stretch yourself during critical moments, the rewards will not come thick and fast. The path to excellence is rarely comfortable. My 90-hour weeks taught me the intricacies of troubleshooting and problem-solving in real-time. They prepared me to ace interviews and equipped me with the skills to tackle challenges throughout my career.

Are We Missing the Point?

The discussions around this topic seem silly because they miss the bigger picture. Long hours are not inherently bad. What matters is the purpose and outcome of those hours. If you’re engaged in meaningful, impactful work that adds to your growth, the hours you put in are an investment, not a burden.

Instead of debating whether 90-hour weeks are “fair,” we should focus on the lessons these periods of intensity can teach us:

1. Building Resilience: Stretching yourself in tough situations builds character and endurance. These are invaluable traits in both personal and professional life.

2. Learning by Doing: Immersing yourself in high-pressure scenarios gives you hands-on experience that no classroom or training session can replicate.

3. Earning Satisfaction: The joy of delivering results and overcoming challenges outweighs the temporary discomfort of long hours.

A Note for Critics

To those who criticise these work philosophies, consider this: Excellence and mediocrity cannot coexist. The satisfaction of achieving something extraordinary often demands extraordinary effort. If you’re not willing to put in the effort when it matters, how can you expect extraordinary results?

Of course, balance is important. Nobody should work 90-hour weeks their entire life. But during critical phases, these hours can provide the push needed to achieve greatness. Instead of dismissing such work schedules outright, why not view them as an opportunity to grow?

I am also sure, while Mr Subrahmanyan demand 90 hr week from employees, the reward for stellar performance, will be mind boggling as are perks/ facilities that employee enjoy. My personal feeling is 99% L& T Folks would wonder what the fuss is all about!? That is how world class entities operate!!! (You pay peanuts- You get Monkeys!). 

Closing Thoughts

To the current generation, I offer this piece of advice: Stop viewing work as a burden and start seeing it as a means to personal and professional fulfilment. Hard work, especially during the early stages of your career, pays dividends for years to come. The key is not to shy away from challenges but to embrace them with purpose and commitment.

Karthik

19th Jan 2025

11am.

End Note: Did I ever work 90-hour weeks post-marriage in 1991? No, the chance didn’t come. But international/ business travel, clocking 35 to 40 weeks a year like a road warrior, was as good as doing 90 hours a week. Did I miss family? Honestly, it never crossed my mind that I was away from home.

Modi’s Missed Opportunity: Why Trump May Be Cold-Shouldering India.

 #608

DolandBhai Spoke to Xi Bhai but not to me!!!!! 

When Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited the United States in September 2024, it should have been an opportunity to strengthen ties with a potential ally in Donald Trump, who was then campaigning strongly for his return to the White House. Yet, Modi decided not to meet Trump at Mar-a-Lago, despite Trump expecting a meeting.

This decision to stay neutral—avoiding engagement with either candidate—might have backfired. Trump, known for his sharp memory and transactional diplomacy, likely interpreted Modi’s silence as a lack of loyalty. For someone who values relationships and personal connections, this perceived slight could be hard to ignore.

A Frosty Response From Trump

Since then, signs of a cooling relationship are becoming clearer. Trump, if elected, seems less interested in prioritising India. He hasn’t named an ambassador to India, even though over 20 ambassadors, including some in minor countries, have already been nominated. This is a glaring omission for a country that has always aspired to be a close U.S. partner.

During his first term, Trump was proactive with India. He attended the massive "Howdy Modi" rally in Houston, supported India on several strategic issues, and often praised Modi’s leadership. The silence now speaks volumes. It is also a reminder that Trump’s America First policy has always been about immediate benefits, and India might not be high on his list this time.

India’s Long History of Playing It Safe

This is not the first time India has hesitated at a crucial moment. Since 1947, India has often chosen to stand in the middle, avoiding strong alliances. Whether it was during the Cold War, the nuclear deal with the U.S., or even economic reforms, India’s reluctance to take bold steps has cost it many opportunities.

The only exception was during Indira Gandhi’s time when she took decisive actions to strengthen India’s global position. From the Bangladesh liberation to the Pokhran nuclear tests, (Smiling Buddha) her leadership was an example of taking risks that paid off. In contrast, India’s recent foreign policy often feels reactive rather than proactive.

Modi’s reluctance to engage with Trump seems to follow this pattern. While it may have been an attempt to appear neutral during the U.S. elections, it came across as indecisive. Trump’s transactional nature means relationships matter deeply, and any hesitation is unlikely to be forgotten.

The H1B Debate: A Brewing Storm

Adding to this tension is the ongoing debate over H1B visas in the U.S. Business leaders like Elon Musk advocate for skilled immigration, arguing that it fuels innovation and growth. On the other side, populist voices like Steve Bannon oppose it, claiming it takes jobs away from Americans.

India, being the largest supplier of H1B workers, is directly affected. With Trump’s focus on "America First," this issue could become another pain point in the relationship unless India works hard to show mutual benefits.

Why Trump’s Silence Should Worry India

Trump’s silence on India is not just about the missed Mar-a-Lago meeting. It reflects a broader shift in priorities. His focus is now on domestic issues: economic revival, border security, and energy independence. Foreign policy, if at all, will be strictly transactional. For Trump, relationships are a give-and-take equation. Without strong Indian efforts to demonstrate benefits, the needle on India-U.S. ties is unlikely to move.

Trump’s America First Agenda: What It Means for India

Donald Trump’s political philosophy revolves around the concept of "America First." This approach prioritises domestic growth, economic revival, and securing America’s borders over extensive foreign engagements. His speeches, policies, and campaign promises indicate that this focus will remain the cornerstone of his administration, should he win the presidency in 2024. While this agenda resonates with Trump’s voter base, it poses challenges for countries like India that rely on robust bilateral ties with the U.S. to further their own strategic and economic goals.

Here are the key aspects of Trump’s priorities and their implications for India:

1. Economic Revival: Domestic Industries Over Globalisation

Trump’s focus is on reviving manufacturing in America and reducing reliance on imports, especially from nations that do not align directly with U.S. interests. This protectionist stance is expected to limit opportunities for countries like India to expand trade relations. For example:

• Tariffs and Trade Barriers: During his first term, Trump imposed tariffs on a range of goods, including those from allies, in the name of protecting American industries. A similar approach could affect Indian exports, particularly in textiles, pharmaceuticals, and IT services.
• Energy Independence: With Trump championing policies like "Drill Baby Drill," his administration would likely prioritise domestic oil and gas production over international energy cooperation. India, a significant buyer of U.S. crude oil, might find such policies limiting its options for energy imports.

2. Border Security and Immigration: The H1B Challenge

One of Trump’s most vocal promises has been securing America’s borders and reforming its immigration policies. His administration has historically cracked down on visa programs like H1B, which are critical for Indian IT professionals. While Elon Musk advocates for skilled immigration to fuel American technological growth, Trump’s administration might lean toward populist policies championed by figures like Steve Bannon, who argue against such programs. For India, this creates:

• Uncertainty for Skilled Workers: The largest share of H1B visas goes to Indians, and stricter immigration policies could disrupt this pipeline, affecting both Indian professionals and U.S.-based tech companies reliant on their expertise.
• Reduced Bilateral Cooperation: Immigration challenges could lead to friction in broader bilateral ties, as seen during Trump’s first term.

3. Energy and Infrastructure: A Closed Loop

Trump’s domestic focus means large investments in U.S. infrastructure, energy independence, and manufacturing. While this is beneficial for the American economy, it leaves little room for foreign countries like India to collaborate or benefit. India, which has been working to secure technology transfers and joint energy projects with the U.S., may find fewer opportunities under a Trump administration focused inward.

4. Foreign Policy: A Transactional Approach

Trump’s foreign policy is famously transactional—alliances and engagements are driven by immediate benefits to the U.S., not long-term strategic interests. This means India would have to offer tangible returns for any cooperation. For example:

• Defence Deals: Trump has always viewed defence partnerships as a way to boost American jobs through arms sales. India may have to prioritise high-value purchases of U.S. defence equipment to maintain goodwill.
• Geopolitical Cooperation: While India plays a key role in countering China’s influence in Asia, Trump’s domestic focus could mean reduced support for strategic initiatives like the Indo-Pacific alliance unless they directly benefit American interests.

5. Limited Focus on Global Leadership

Unlike traditional U.S. administrations that emphasised global leadership, Trump’s focus has been on addressing domestic challenges first. This shift could impact India in areas such as:

• Climate Change Cooperation: India has relied on partnerships with the U.S. for clean energy funding and technology. Under Trump, who has previously pulled out of the Paris Agreement, these efforts could stall.
• Multilateral Forums: India’s aspirations for a permanent seat on the UN Security Council or greater influence in global financial institutions may not receive active support from a Trump administration focused inward.

Repairing the Damage

India needs to act fast to rebuild trust with Trump. Here’s what the government can do:

1. Show Strategic Value:
   Focus on defence and trade agreements that benefit both nations. For instance, India could offer deals on American fighter jets or technology partnerships.

2. Leverage the Indian-American Community:
   The 4-million-strong Indian diaspora is a significant political and economic force in the U.S. India should encourage its diaspora to advocate for stronger bilateral ties.

3. Be Proactive in Communication:
   Regular high-level engagement can help rebuild trust. A well-planned visit to the U.S. with a clear agenda to discuss mutual growth areas could help reset the relationship.

4. Take a Clear Stand:
   Avoid sitting on the fence. Be bold in aligning with the U.S. on key global issues like countering China, securing technology transfers, and enhancing energy cooperation.

5. India must recognise that Trump’s priorities will revolve around "What’s in it for America?" For India, this means rethinking its engagement strategy and aligning proposals with Trump’s domestic goals. Here’s what India can do:

   • Invest in U.S. Manufacturing: India can offer partnerships that create American jobs, such as establishing Indian manufacturing plants in the U.S. or co-developing technologies with American firms.
   • Strengthen Defence Ties: High-value defence deals, such as acquiring U.S. fighter jets or missile systems, could help rebuild trust and demonstrate India’s commitment to the relationship.
   • Leverage the Diaspora: The Indian-American community, particularly in swing states, can play a crucial role in advocating for stronger ties between the two nations.
   • Prove Value in Strategic Partnerships: India must highlight its role as a counterbalance to China, offering tangible benefits like intelligence sharing, joint military exercises, and technology collaborations.

The Larger Picture

This situation is a stark reminder that diplomacy in today’s world is about making timely decisions. Trump’s cold response should push India to rethink its foreign policy approach. For too long, India has avoided bold moves, choosing to stay "non-aligned." While this strategy worked during the Cold War, it is less effective in today’s fast-changing geopolitical landscape.

India’s credibility depends on its ability to show consistency and decisiveness. Modi’s government must ensure that India is seen as a dependable partner, not one that hesitates when it matters most.

Looking Ahead

The road ahead will not be easy. Trump’s focus on domestic priorities means India will have to work harder to grab his attention. Building trust with someone as transactional as Trump will require bold moves and practical demonstrations of value. This is not the time to hesitate or play it safe.

India must learn from its history of missed opportunities. Otherwise, it risks being left behind in a world where standing still means falling back. With Russia also on a downward spiral and China a perceived enemy, we have nowhere to turn to!!!! 

Karthik

18th Jan 2025. (Boy 34 years since Bush Sr Bombed Baghdad.... My wedding day too ahhahah!)... 

Pete Hegseth’s Confirmation: A Canary in the Coal Mine.

 #607

Personal Update:- 

Boy; 35 days flew by. Great time. Shravan leaving tonight for SFO. Radha/Eshwar/ Sangeetha reached last week. 

Pete Hegseth’s (SecDef) confirmation process was a fascinating litmus test, revealing not just the calibre of the nominee but also the unvarnished bias and lack of bipartisanship among Democratic senators. Figures like Richard Blumenthal and Elizabeth Warren exhibited overt hostility, relying more on personal contempt and ideological disdain than substantive arguments. Their approach unintentionally showcased their naivety, as Hegseth demonstrated composure, resilience, and an articulate defence of his views, ultimately emerging unscathed and stronger.

From the outset, it seemed clear that President Trump had a broader strategy in play. Using Hegseth as a "canary in the coal mine," he tested the waters for his broader nominee slate. Hegseth’s ability to "come out with flying colours" not only vindicates Trump’s confidence in his appointees but also exposes the Democratic senators' inability to engage constructively. Their approach likely backfired, amplifying their partisan image and alienating undecided or moderate voters.

Implications for the Senate and Public Perception

The confirmation process also served as a reminder of the growing partisan divide in Washington. Democratic senators, instead of addressing policy concerns or qualifications, often resorted to emotional rhetoric. This exposes their lack of willingness to engage in bipartisanship—ironically reinforcing one of the key critiques Republicans have levelled against them.

Moreover, Hegseth’s successful handling of these hearings could serve as a roadmap for future nominees. His poise under pressure will likely resonate with both the Senate and the American public, particularly those who value a robust, principled defence of one’s record over theatrical grandstanding.

A Test for Bipartisanship or Deepening Partisan Lines?

As for RFK Jr., (SecHHS) the dynamics could be more nuanced. While a few Republican senators may harbour reservations about his nomination, these would likely stem from principled disagreements rather than personal or ideological animosity. The contrast between the Republicans’ likely approach to RFK Jr. and the Democrats’ treatment of Hegseth could offer a stark lens into the bipartisan (or lack thereof) ethos of each party.

If RFK Jr. faces internal resistance within the GOP, it will likely be isolated to a handful of senators, as Republicans generally lean towards a unified front. By comparison, Democrats’ hostility towards Hegseth highlights an entrenched cultural disdain for Trump’s nominees, irrespective of their qualifications or stances.

Conclusion: Sailing Through While Exposing Bias

Hegseth’s confirmation is likely to sail through the Senate, as will most of Trump’s other nominees. However, this episode has done more than advance a single appointment—it has pulled back the curtain on the ideological bias within the Senate. The public now has a clearer view of the partisanship that dominates Democratic decision-making.

In the end, Trump’s strategic use of Hegseth as a “canary in the coal mine” has paid dividends. Not only has it reinforced the perception of competence within his ranks, but it has also laid bare the Democrats’ susceptibility to partisan attacks that lack substance. If nothing else, it is a reminder that political overreach often does more harm to its perpetrators than its targets.

Karthik

15th Jan 2025

12Noon.